Monday, September 21, 2020

NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED WEEKLY ON WEDNESDAY • WEBSITE UPDATED WEEKLY FOR THURSDAY

Home News Branding, bills, and buyers: Sites Project celebrates progress

Branding, bills, and buyers: Sites Project celebrates progress

Assembly Member James Gallagher speaks about the sites project at a press conference in Maxwell on Oct. 21.
Assembly Member James Gallagher speaks about the sites project at a press conference in Maxwell on Oct. 21.

Debuting a logo, a new website, and a (relatively) new office, the Sites Reservoir Project unveiled the fruits of a months-long branding effort at a press conference in Maxwell on Oct. 21.

The new logo for the project — a sleek, minimalist graphic with elements that connect the environment, farms, and water — was attached to a podium at the front of the Sites Joint Powers Authority headquarters, where an equally diverse group of people came together and took turns speaking about the project’s progress and milestones. Local and state elected officials, regional water managers, and agricultural, labor, and business leaders were among those on hand to celebrate a number key milestones. “We have a lot to be proud of,” Kim Vann, Sites Board chair, said.

The Sites Reservoir offstream storage project, which continues to gain momentum, could add 500,000 acre-feet of water to be used by the state’s homes, farms, businesses, and for the ecosystem in an average year.

Among the milestones celebrated on Oct. 21 were the passage of an assembly bill that will speed up the construction and reduce the cost of the reservoir, and the addition of new agencies who have pledged to take part in the project.

The bill, AB-2551, was co-authored by Assemblyman James Gallagher and State Senator Jim Nielsen, and signed by Gov. Jerry Brown on Sept. 28 of this year. Both Gallagher and Nielsen spoke at the press conference.

“This is a historic day. For over 50 years, since Dwight D. Eisenhower was president, we’ve been talking about Sites Reservoir,” Gallagher said. “But with what we’ve put together right now, we are actually on the path to making Sites a reality.”

Why will it be different this time around? Gallagher cited a confluence of circumstances that point to Sites finally getting built: the passage of Proposition 1, which made $2.7 billion available for water storage projects; the interest and commitment shown by stakeholders; successful outreach and promotion by the Sites Joint Powers Authority; and the passage of AB-2551.

Nielsen commended the board for their work so far, and said that the progress on the proposed Sites Reservoir Project -— and more generally, the passage of Proposition 1 — signaled a paradigm shift in California’s water and energy policy.

“This is not for us. This is for our grandchildren. This is a time in California history where we are looking forward again — we’re looking big, rather than small. We’re not lowering expectations; we’re raising our expectations,” Nielsen said.

The renewed focus on investing in water infrastructure and the passage of Proposition 1 were made possible by a “broad coalition” of interests, Nielsen said, and that coalition would need to remain intact.

“Don’t  savor the victory and think the deal is done. Until we break ground, and we put the last gallon in that reservoir, it won’t be a done deal. So let’s keep together, and let’s launch another push to ensure this dream becomes a reality for our children,” Nielsen said.

Other participants spoke about the economic and ecological benefits of the project, locally and statewide.

“Sites is a critical project for both the local and statewide economy,” said Robbie Hunter, President of State Building and Construction Trades Council of California. “A project of this magnitude will help stabilize water supplies and provide much needed economic development in the North State region while also creating thousands of jobs and apprenticeship opportunities for local young men and women.”

“The North State has embraced a new and different conversation about water that will more effectively serve the needs of the environment,” said David Guy, President of the Northern California Water Association. “Sites is one of only a handful of water storage projects that can truly deliver the public benefits of environmental flows and water quality.”

“Family Water Alliance, Inc., and their Sacramento Valley Fish Screen Program have worked to protect and save California fish species for over 20 years,” said Nadine Bailey with Family Water Alliance. “Our organization supports the Sites Project because it is a solution that will protect California family farms and our fishery resources.”

“Building Sites Reservoir is vital the Sacramento Valley,” said Tim Johnson, President and CEO of the California Rice Commission. “We need additional surface water storage to help all aspects of our region for future generations, including four annual salmon runs, habitat for millions of birds that depend on area rice fields, our small towns and family farms.”

Private investment

In her opening comments, Vann noted that 34 agencies had joined Sites “in a demonstration of support.” Of the 34 agencies currently investing in the project, 19 are in the Sacramento Valley.

That support is crucial, as commitments by those agencies have directly funded the project in its first phase.

The project has commitments from those 34 agencies for a total of about 377,000 annual acre-feet of water through Phase 1 of the project. Those currently participating are ponying up about $60 per acre-foot of water. That cost will rise incrementally over the project’s five phases. By the time water is actually there to be delivered, the cost per acre-foot will be somewhere in the neighborhood of $600.

Should the Sites project receive full amount of the Proposition 1 funding it is seeking, however, there might not be 377,000 acre-feet of water available to private investors.

The Sites Reservoir project is currently seeking about $2.1 billion, or half of the anticipated cost of constructing the reservoir, in bond funding made available by Proposition 1.

If the state elects to finance that $2.1 billion in full, it would guarantee that half of the estimated 500,000 acre-feet of water the reservoir could store annually would go to public benefits, leaving 250,000 acre-feet for investors and private water users.

The project has a little breathing room with commitments for 377,000 acre-feet from the private sector. At a meeting earlier this year, Sites Reservoir general manager Jim Watson said that the project would need commitments for about 330,000 acre-feet of water in the event that the water commission would only fund $1.5 billion of the project.

Brian Pearson
Brian Pearson
Brian Pearson is the former Managing Editor & Reporter for the Williams Pioneer Review. Brian joined the Williams Pioneer Review in June 2016 and is committed to bringing hyperlocal news to its readers. A few of his projects included reporting local government and the sports page.

More News

Three killed on I-5 in two separate accidents 

Three people were killed on Interstate 5 in Colusa County over a five day period in two separate accidents.  A Yuba City couple were killed...

Garden Club Plant Sale

The Garden Club of Colusa County hosted their fall plant sale in the Davison Pavilion in Colusa on Saturday, Sept. 8. The event, which...

Coaches Corner: Dan Kiely

Soccer in Colusa County has a long history of competitive play and a major contributor to that tradition is Colusa High School boys’ soccer...

First Patriot Day ceremony held at Williams Elementary School

Students who attend Williams Elementary School were not alive 19 years ago when hijackers used airplanes as weapons of destruction to kill nearly 3,000...

Distance learning raises questions about home imagery

Editors Note: The article has been updated from the print version to correct the spelling of Tiffany Sines. Distance learning seems to be more challenging...

Local Government

County appoints new Airport Advisory Committee

The Colusa County Board of Supervisors on Sept. 1 appointed seven members to the newly restructured Airport Advisory Committee. The previous committee of about 15...

Colusa Police Department: July 2020

The City of Colusa Police Department responded to 382 calls for service, up from 311 in June. There were an additional 31 calls to...

City of Colusa adopts strategy for economic development

The Colusa City Council last week adopted the final Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy, a report that will serve as a roadmap intended to diversify...

Public & Legal Notices

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT FILE NO. 2020-0000072 Date filed: September 11, 2020 The following persons are doing business as: GULLATT RANCH Business Address: 6880 GREENBAY ROAD, ARBUCKLE, CA 95912 Mailing...

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT FILE NO. 2020-0000071 Date filed: September 1, 2020 The following persons are doing business as: C & C ENGINEERING Business Address: 2081 LONE STAR ROAD,...

Notice of Lien Sale

NOTICE OF LIEN SALE SEPTEMBER 20, 2020 AT 5:00 PM 423 SIOC STREET, COLUSA, CA 95932 8’  3’ GOLD WING 09/16/2020 • WPR #2020-1142

CIUDAD DE COLUSA AVISO DE AUDIENCIA PÚBLICA

CIUDAD DE COLUSA AVISO DE AUDIENCIA PÚBLICA AVISO SE DA A LA PRESENTE QUE la Comisión de Ciudad de Colusa y  Planificación llevará a cabo un...

CITY OF COLUSA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

CITY OF COLUSA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Colusa and Planning Commission will hold public workshop on Wednesday, September...