Sunday, November 29, 2020

NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED WEEKLY ON WEDNESDAY - WEBSITE UPDATED THURSDAY

Colusa Planning Commission recommends approval of new Greenceuticals DA

In a manner that could best be described as begrudging, the City of Colusa’s planning commission recommended in a 4-1 decision that the city council approve a new development agreement for Greenceuticals’ new project location at the corner of Bridge and Main Streets.

At times, Monday night’s special meeting was contentious – particularly in the exchanges between commissioners and city staff – and pointed to an ongoing discord between the planning commission and the city council.

Commissioners were frustrated by the lack of information included in the Greenceuticals development agreement. Unlike previous development agreements the commission had considered for cannabis projects, the Greenceuticals agreement included no site-specific details. That rankled a number of commissioners.

Commissioner George Parker also questioned why the commission was holding a special meeting to consider the item, rather than doing so at a regularly scheduled meeting – especially considering the lack of information that had been presented to the commission on Monday night.  

City Planner Bryan Stice explained that the city council had requested the commission hold a special meeting to expedite the process for Greenceuticals, and that development agreements didn’t need to include site-specific details, which would be hashed out when a company applies for its cannabis facilities regulatory permit and special use permit through the city council.

“It’s those permits where the city council reviews the site-specific details of the proposal,” Stice said. “In the last year, as part of our review with the planning commission for just the development agreements, we dealt a lot with the site-specific issues… and we’ve realized that we were being overly repetitive… Now that we’re a year into this, we focusing really on issues just pertaining to the development agreement.”

In other words, city staff had previously been giving the planning commission more information than they needed to for the purpose of making a recommendation on a development agreement – and they didn’t need to include that site-specific information going forward.

“We refined the process to how is the proposed development agreement consistent with Ordinance 519, which is our cannabis ordinance, and limited it to that discussion – because that’s all that’s really at stake as part of the development agreement,” Stice said. 

A number of commissioners took issue with that. Brendan Farrell said that without better information on development agreements, the planning commission was effectively just rubber stamping things for the city council, and questioned the purpose of having a planning commission if that was the case. Richard Selover and George Parker both said they were blindsided by the change in procedure for handling development agreements.

“At this point, I’m a little upset with council,” Selover said.

A total of three motions were actually made during the meeting, all of which came after a lengthy period of public comment and commission deliberation. The first came from Ken Flagor Jr., seconded by Brendan Farrell, recommending that the city council deny the development agreement, which failed when the vote was called. The second was George Parker’s motion to continue the item to the next regular meeting. Continuing the item would have delayed the Greenceuticals project – an action that the planning commission has taken before on cannabis-related development agreements. Prior to Parker’s motion receiving a second, City Manager Jesse Cain interjected.

“I was asked by council not to let this be pushed,” Cain said. “Make a decision, either yes or no, on it. Council had a special meeting, they opened up the project to actually sell the property. They decided to sell the property based on this particular project, and that’s the one reason why we’re here tonight.”

Parker asked whether Cain thought that was an “overreach of that authority to this body, and the process.”

Cain said he didn’t. 

“Wow,” Parker said, before the motion died for lack of a second. Both Flagor and Farrell said it wouldn’t be fair to the applicant to continue the item, while the commission and the council worked out their differences. 

“In my opinion, we should pass it and let the city council run with it, and do what they want to do,” Flagor said, before moving to recommend approval. The motion carried 4-1, with Parker voting against it.  ■

Brian Pearson
Brian Pearson
Brian Pearson is the former Managing Editor & Reporter for the Williams Pioneer Review. Brian joined the Williams Pioneer Review in June 2016 and is committed to bringing hyperlocal news to its readers. A few of his projects included reporting local government and the sports page.

More News

Colusa County COVID-19 cases on the rise

The spike in Colusa County COVID-19 cases has forced Colusa County on Tuesday to move back into the most restrictive “purple” tier on Gov....

Sacramento Valley Mirror publisher dead at 77

Tim Crews, founder, publisher and editor of the Sacramento Valley Mirror in Willows, died on Thursday, Nov. 12., at Shasta Regional Medical Center, in...

Fair Board postpones Colusa Farm Show

The 56th annual Colusa Farm Show will not happen in February as usual, but the 44th District Agriculture Association hasn’t given up hope entirely...

County to help small farmers replace old tractors

Colusa County is looking to make good on its promise to find a way for small farming operations to participate in a state grant...

Colusa tree dedicated to longtime Colusa Tree Commissioner

Family and friends of the late Charles Whitcome Tuttle gathered in Will S. Green Park on Sunday as Colusa officials dedicated a tree in...

Local Government

What’s that smell? Colusa to crackdown on pot odors 

The smell emitted from marijuana  is something you either love or hate. But with Colusa-dwellers making their opinions of the pungent plant - which some...

County to help small farmers replace old tractors

Colusa County is looking to make good on its promise to find a way for small farming operations to participate in a state grant...

County to help small farmers replace old tractors

Colusa County is looking to make good on its promise to find a way for small farming operations to participate in a state grant...

Public & Legal Notices

City of Williams – Advertisement for Bids

CITY OF WILLIAMS WILLIAMS, CA WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SCHEDULE A - WATER METER REPLACEMENTS ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS Separate sealed Bids for the construction of the Water System Improvement...

Pierce Joint Unified School District – Public Notice

    PIERCE JOINT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC NOTICE PROPOSED ENERGY SERVICES CONTRACT 256.6 KW PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR PROJECT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on December 10, 2020 at 5:00...

FBN: Ariiasbtque

FICTITIOUS BUSINESS NAME STATEMENT FILE NO. 2020-0000106 Date filed: November 17, 2020 The following persons are doing business as: ARIIASBTQUE Business Address: 133 9TH STREET, WILLIAMS CA 95987 Mailing Address:...

City of Colusa – Ordinance No. 533

CITY OF COLUSA ORDINANCE NO. 533 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLUSA APPROVING PREZONING TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (M-1-PD, M-2-PD, AND P-F-PD) AND...

Colusa County Planning Commission – Notice of Public Hearing

COLUSA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Colusa County Planning Commission will conduct a Public Hearing on December 2,...

Latest Headlines