Home Opinions Opinion: California Chief Justice’s emergency bail order violates Constitution, makes citizens less...

Opinion: California Chief Justice’s emergency bail order violates Constitution, makes citizens less safe

By Matthew R. Beauchamp, District Attorney County of Colusa

Although we face serious challenges not seen in more than one hundred years, we, as citizens, must earnestly reject the urge to surrender important rights under our Federal and State Constitutions.

On April 6, 2020, our California Chief Justice issued the most recent in a series of emergency orders in the wake of the global pandemic. This order, which sets $0 bail for most misdemeanors and a large number of “non-violent” felonies, while well intended, has the practical effect of allowing criminals to victimize our citizens and communities with impunity. It robs our law enforcement of the ability to arrest and hold people who have committed the following crimes: child abuse and endangerment, trafficking of heroin and methamphetamine to our youth, physical or financial abuse of an elder adult, abuse of a dependent adult, human trafficking, fraud and embezzlement, obstructing or delaying a public health emergency worker, auto-theft, burglary, to name a few. This emergency order is bad policy and bad news for the law-abiding people of Colusa County who depend on our law enforcement and court system for upholding the rule of law and public safety because it will certainly lead to more crime.

One week before the zero bail order, Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye stated firmly, “No need and no right will be overlooked” by the Court during the current crisis. However, this new emergency zero bail order that mandates $0 bail for all misdemeanor and felony offenses, with the exception of only certain listed offenses, overlooks the numerous enumerated rights of crime victims that are expressly provided by Article 1, Section 28 of the California Constitution.

While the genuine intent behind the adoption of the emergency zero bail schedule is the health and safety of incarcerated individuals, its implementation as written will greatly increase the risk of harm to many in Colusa County who are more vulnerable now than before. As an example, children, the disabled, or elderly adults will be at greater risk of harm if their abusers are allowed to be released from custody on zero bail and a court date extended for months down the road.

To date, there have been no cases of coronavirus within our jail inmate population. Moreover, Sheriff Garofalo is prepared with a plan and resources to isolate and treat any inmate for COVID exposure. Opening the jail doors for those awaiting trial is premature and may actually increase the risk of their exposure to COVID-19 by putting them in the community.

In addition to the crimes above, those who are arrested for crimes such as drug trafficking, theft, and fraud will be empowered to commit the same crimes over and over because the zero bail order mandates zero bail on each arrest. These individuals who have been arrested on probable cause will now be released to possibly repeat their crime in the community where most Colusans are doing their best to stay safe and comply with the emergency health orders.

The ultimate irony is in the area of enforcement of the April 10, 2020 Colusa Public Health Officer’s shelter-in-place/stay at home order. A violation of that Order is a misdemeanor that is not excepted from zero bail. A COVID-19 positive individual can willfully disobey this Order repeatedly and merely be released on zero bail and given a citation to appear in Court months later. The law must have enforcement mechanisms – to protect everyone – in the event some do not voluntarily comply.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, it is my belief that the emergency zero bail order expressly violates several enumerated rights granted by the California Constitution.

Article 1, Section 28 of the California Constitution is known as “Marsy’s Rights.” The section includes a list of enumerated and personally enforceable rights. Among them, several that are impacted by this zero bail order are:

“To be reasonably protected from the defendant and persons acting on behalf of the defendant”;

“To have the safety of the victim and the victim’s family considered in fixing the amount of bail and release conditions for the defendant”; “To be heard, upon request, at any proceeding, … involving a post-arrest release decision, plea, sentencing, post-conviction release decision, or any proceeding in which a right of the victim is at issue”; “To be informed, … of, the scheduled release date of the defendant, and the release of … the defendant from custody”.

Safeguarding Constitutional protections for victims, and the general public, is paramount for public safety, especially during this California health emergency. Cal. Const. Art. 1, Section 28 of the California Constitution includes an additional right with respect to setting bail as follows: Public Safety Bail. A person may be released on bail by sufficient sureties, except for capital crimes when the facts are evident or the presumption great. Excessive bail may not be required. In setting, reducing or denying bail, the judge or magistrate shall take into consideration the protection of the public, the safety of the victim, the seriousness of the offense charged, the previous criminal record of the defendant, and the probability of his or her appearing at the trial or hearing of the case. Public safety and the safety of the victim shall be the primary considerations. Cal. Const. Art. 1, Sec. 28 (f) (3). [Emphasis added.]

During this health emergency, all people in our communities are more vulnerable. Limiting crime victims or the People’s representative, the District Attorney, from the opportunity to oppose the release of an individual arrested for crimes impacting public safety, deprives victims and the community of the Constitutional protections granted to all Californians. While the District Attorney can still request an increase in bail in individual cases, that assumes either that an arrestee remains in custody until his arraignment, or the District Attorney is aware of unique facts regarding a suspect at the very time of his arrest. How often will that happen with zero bail? A first appearance in court by a suspect will become the exception, not the rule during this era of zero bail. The Chief Justice’s zero bail order, while well intended, creates more problems than it solves.

Submissions
Submissions
The Williams Pioneer Review has a small staff of one, covering all of Colusa County; but we’re proud to have the assistance of a large army of community contributors to extend our range and reach. This is one of those stories. If you have a story you would like to share, please email them to: news@colusacountynews.com or give us a call.

Recent News

The great rubber ducky race!

Jim Davison Memorial Rubber Duckie Race got underway on the Sacramento River in Colusa on a beautiful Fourth of July holiday. Rubber ducks floated...

County residents urged to wear masks, keep distance

With Gov. Gavin Newsom launching his massive “Wear a Mask” public awareness campaign, funded largely by the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (Facebook), Colusa County Public...

4th of July fireworks cancelled

On Monday, Colusa County Fair CEO, Laura Ford, announced in partnership with the Colusa Flare Committee, “that due to the COVID-19 pandemic the annual...

Residents peruse art at outdoor exhibit

The high heat or fear of COVID-19 didn’t stop local residents from enjoying the Art Walk in Colusa, on Friday. The outdoor event on Fifth...

Farm Fresh at the Arbuckle Market

The Arbuckle Farmers Market opened to a large reception on Wednesday, with many staying to chat with neighbors. Produce, nuts, the Master Gardeners, catered...

Local Government

County approves stopgap budget

The Colusa County Board of Supervisors last week approved a recommended budget for 2020-21 although the numbers are expected to change dramatically when the...

Court restarts trials, struggles to adapt to COVID-19 restrictions

Colusa County Superior Court will remain on limited operations through the end of July, state officials announced Thursday, although COVID-19 restrictions could make it...

Williams passes on 2020 mosquito abatement

The residents of Williams will have to fight the nuisance of mosquitoes on their own this summer. The City Council decided at their June 17...

Public & Legal Notices

CITY OF COLUSA PLANNING COMMISSION – NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING (MIDSIZE SHOPPING CENTER/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT)

CITY OF COLUSA PLANNING COMMISSION NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION will hold a Public Hearing in the City Council...

CITY OF WILLIAMS – PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE – WILLIAMS LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT

CITY OF WILLIAMS PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE On July 15, 2020 at 6:00 p.m., in City Hall of the City of Williams, a Public Hearing will...

CITY OF WILLIAMS – NOTICE OF ELECTION

CITY OF WILLIAMS NOTICE OF ELECTION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT a General Municipal Election will be held in the City of Williams, California on Tuesday,...

COUNTY OF COLUSA – NOTICE OF ELECTION

COUNTY OF COLUSA NOTICE OF ELECTION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an election will be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020 for the purpose of electing...

COUNTY OF COLUSA – NOTICE OF ELECTION – SCHOOL DISTRICTS

COUNTY OF COLUSA NOTICE OF ELECTION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an election will be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2020 for the purpose of electing...